Central Banking's Historical Roots: Fractional Reserves, Gold Standard Abandonments, and the 1933 Bank Holiday
Historical facts on the 1933 Bank Holiday, FDR's gold policies, Britain's 1931 gold standard exit, and Fed gold reserve rules corroborate core claims in the Mises/ZeroHedge article, though interpretive critiques of central banking remain heterodox.
The article 'Central Banking: The Scourge Of Civilization' by George Ford Smith, originally from the Mises Institute and republished on ZeroHedge, critiques fractional reserve banking and central banking as mechanisms that create money through bookkeeping entries rather than savings, linking these practices to economic instability exemplified by the Great Depression. Historical records confirm key elements of this narrative. The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 mandated that the Fed hold gold reserves equal to 40 percent of the currency it issued, allowing interest rate adjustments to influence gold flows between the public and banks.
During the early 1930s, bank runs accelerated as depositors withdrew funds amid eroding confidence, with Britain abandoning the gold standard on September 21, 1931, prompting foreign conversions of dollar assets into gold. This vulnerability stemmed from the dual promise of fractional reserves and full redeemability. On March 6, 1933—mere days after his inauguration—President Franklin D. Roosevelt declared a national bank holiday via Proclamation 2039, suspending banking transactions for a week to stem failures and hoarding, as documented by the Federal Reserve History and the American Presidency Project. A month later, Executive Order 6102 required Americans to surrender most gold coin, bullion, and certificates (with limited exemptions) in exchange for dollars at $20.67 per ounce, under authority from the Emergency Banking Act.
While the piece frames these events as enabling inflationary credit expansion from 'ether,' mainstream accounts emphasize stabilization efforts. The Mises Institute analysis connects these dots to broader critiques of central banking's role in booms and busts, echoing Austrian economics perspectives on monetary intervention. Related context includes how the Emergency Banking Act of 1933 facilitated bank reopenings and influenced later deposit insurance frameworks.
[Mises Institute Analyst]: These verified monetary interventions of the 1930s entrenched central banking's influence on credit creation, potentially amplifying future cycles unless structural reforms address reserve mechanics.
Sources (6)
- [1]Bank Holiday of 1933 | Federal Reserve History(https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/bank-holiday-of-1933)
- [2]Executive Order 6102 - Wikipedia(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Executive_Order_6102)
- [3]The end of the gold standard and the beginning of recovery from the Great Depression - CEPR(https://cepr.org/voxeu/columns/end-gold-standard-and-beginning-recovery-great-depression)
- [4]Roosevelt's Gold Program | Federal Reserve History(https://www.federalreservehistory.org/essays/roosevelts-gold-program)
- [5]Central Banking: The Scourge of Civilization | Mises Institute(https://mises.org/mises-wire/central-banking-scourge-civilization)
- [6]Proclamation 2039—Bank Holiday, March 6-9, 1933 | American Presidency Project(https://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/documents/proclamation-2039-bank-holiday-march-6-9-1933-inclusive)