Eugene Police Quotes $2.48 Million and 44,816 Hours for One Officer's 2018-2026 Records
Eugene PD issued a $2.48 million fee estimate for targeted officer records by claiming a need to review all city employee files. The calculation exceeds documented technology expenditures and conflicts with standard public records search protocols. The case tests enforcement of Oregon fee reasonableness requirements against small newsrooms.
Double Sided Media sought records on Eugene Police officer Justin Peckels focused on complaints from 2018 through 2026, including a documented facial strike during a traffic stop. The department replied that it must search every city employee record, past and present, claiming no ability to limit custodians. A parallel request for former officer Eric Klinko received a $195,869.52 estimate, bringing the combined total near $2.7 million.
Oregon public records law permits reasonable fees but requires agencies to conduct searches in the locations most likely to hold responsive material. The city's blanket approach across all departments contradicts standard practice documented in state administrative rules and prior appellate decisions. Meanwhile, the same department executed a $342,000 contract for Flock license plate readers, demonstrating capacity for targeted data systems when acquisition rather than disclosure is the goal.
The fee structure functions as a barrier that disproportionately affects small outlets without litigation budgets. Similar cost inflation has appeared in other jurisdictions facing scrutiny over individual officer files, often resolved only after appeals or lawsuits. Double Sided Media now faces the choice of narrowing scope further, appealing internally, or seeking judicial review under ORS 192.311 to test whether the estimate meets statutory reasonableness standards.
Operational transparency requires searchable databases and defined custodian lists. Without those, agencies retain the ability to price out oversight regardless of statutory mandates.
Oregon DOJ: Issues written determination on fee reasonableness within 90 days of appeal filing.
Sources (3)
- [1]Oregon Public Records Law Request Response(https://theintercept.com/2026/10/01/oregon-police-misconduct-public-records-cost-fee/)
- [2]Oregon Revised Statutes Chapter 192(https://www.oregonlegislature.gov/bills_laws/ors/ors192.html)
- [3]ACLU Oregon v. City of Eugene Flock Records Filing(https://www.aclu-or.org/en/cases/aclu-oregon-v-city-eugene)