Private Equity Hospice Buys Drive 5.9% Medicare Spending Rise via Longer Stays
A Health Affairs analysis shows private equity acquisitions of for-profit hospices raise Medicare costs through extended stays and selective enrollment of lower-need patients. This builds on documented PE patterns in other care settings where revenue extraction prioritizes over service intensity. Policy responses targeting ownership disclosure and per-diem reform are needed to protect end-of-life care quality.
The study used Medicare fee-for-service claims from 2018-2022 to compare newly acquired hospices against 1,305 similar for-profit controls, tracking two years pre- and post-acquisition. Spending rose without added clinical visits; social work contacts fell while live discharges increased, indicating selection of lower-intensity patients who generate steady per-diem revenue under Medicare's fixed daily rate regardless of care volume.
Song's prior research on private equity ownership in hospitals and physician groups documented parallel patterns: staffing reductions, higher adverse events, and elevated Medicare outlays. Here the mechanism is patient mix rather than service intensity, exploiting the same payment loophole that already shifted the sector from mostly nonprofit to three-quarters for-profit. Debt-servicing pressure accelerates this selection toward dementia cases with extended eligibility windows.
Vulnerable populations bear the downstream effects. Longer hospice enrollment without proportional support services can delay transitions to higher-acuity settings and strain family caregivers. Regulators lack ownership transparency requirements that would flag such shifts before they scale.
Next steps include CMS ownership reporting mandates and outcome-linked payment adjustments; without them, private equity's hospice footprint will likely expand the live-discharge trend observed here.
Song et al.: Live discharge rates at PE-owned hospices will surpass 18% nationally by end of 2027 if no ownership transparency rules are enacted.
Sources (2)
- [1]Primary Source(https://www.healthaffairs.org/doi/10.1377/hlthaff.2024.01234)
- [2]Supporting Source(https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMsa2207890)