Former Attorney General Pam Bondi testified before the House Oversight Committee that the Department of Justice produced 'everything required' under the Epstein Files Transparency Act, a law passed by Congress and signed by President Trump to compel the release of millions of pages related to Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell. Bondi, who was replaced by Todd Blanche in April, stated that Blanche oversaw the labor-intensive process involving over 3 million pages, while acknowledging some redaction errors that occurred during review of witness names and sensitive information. However, the closed-door session—criticized by Democrats like Rep. Robert Garcia and Rep. James Walkinshaw as insufficiently public—has fueled accusations of a cover-up, with lawmakers questioning delays, selective withholding of documents, and whether politically connected individuals were protected. This development fits a broader pattern of delayed transparency in high-profile cases involving elites: despite the Act's mandate for searchable, downloadable unclassified records (with narrow exceptions for victim privacy), bipartisan criticism has persisted over improperly redacted files, claims of millions of additional pages withheld as 'duplicative' or 'privileged,' and missing witness interviews (FD-302s). Official DOJ releases began in phases starting February 2025, yet survivors, journalists, and lawmakers continue to identify gaps, echoing historical frustrations with Epstein-related probes that have long suggested networks of influence shielding accountability. Legacy coverage has often framed these as procedural hiccups rather than systemic resistance, missing connections to repeated failures in declassifying full flight logs, client references, and communications that could implicate powerful figures. Real external corroboration from congressional records and major outlets confirms the testimony occurred on May 30, 2026, the existence of the 2025 law, and ongoing disputes over completeness, underscoring how institutional processes can suppress fuller disclosure even under direct legislative pressure.