The BRICS foreign ministers' meeting in New Delhi concluded without a joint statement, as documented in the Indian government's official readout citing differing national positions on the US-Israeli actions against Iran and West Asia security. Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi's public remarks, reported via Iranian state media, directly implicated the UAE in facilitating military operations through airspace and bases, referencing the 2020 Abraham Accords framework that formalized Israel-UAE security ties. This stance contrasts with UAE and Saudi statements emphasizing national sovereignty and counterterrorism cooperation, as seen in their separate responses to Red Sea threats and Bab al-Mandab Strait navigation. Primary UN correspondence from Iran's envoy in April 2026 demands compensation from five Arab states for alleged involvement, highlighting compensation claims absent from multilateral forums. Such fractures extend beyond rhetoric to energy dynamics: Gulf states' dual roles in OPEC+ production quotas and potential alternative supply routes could reroute crude flows away from unified BRICS de-dollarization pushes toward bilateral arrangements with Asian importers. Indian and Chinese perspectives, reflected in their respective BRICS interventions, prioritize trade stability over bloc-wide condemnations, underscoring how unresolved Gaza and Red Sea issues fragment collective leverage on sanctions evasion mechanisms.